Legal Updates Spring 2017
Written By:
Reid
Jun 01, 2017
The Legal Updates Spring 2017 column contains cases which address the following issues:
- Promise suspect would not be put on the sex offenders' list rendered his confession involuntary
- The statement "You can say the truth, explain what happened and they can work with you when the time comes to go see a judge. It will be less charges." was not a promise of leniency
- Promise of leniency coupled with threat to defendant's wife resulted in a coerced confession
- The statement, "I feel like I should have an attorney" was not an unequivocal request for an attorney
- Court finds investigators' behavior "shocking to the conscience"
- Ten hour questioning period was not coercive
- Court upholds rejection of false confession expert as not relevant; also that second advisement of rights not necessary after a 6 hour gap between questioning
- The results of psychological tests (Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale) do not square with reality
- Court rejects testimony of false confession expert Dr. Richard Leo as "faux science"
- A suspect does not have to be aware of all the crimes he will be questioned about to make a valid rights waiver
- Court finds confession was coerced and involuntary
- The statement "I don't know, just, I'm done talking. I don't have nothing to talk about" was an unequivocal invocation of the right to remain silent