Legal Updates Spring 2012
Written By:
Reid
Apr 18, 2012
In our Legal Updates Spring 2012 column we feature cases that address the following issues:
Continue Reading
- Defendant does not have to actually speak to invoke the right to remain silent
- Statement to suspect that he "should explain his mistake so that his daughter did not have to grow up without her dad" rendered the confession inadmissible
- Suspect told he would "only be a witness if he had merely been present but had not been a shooter." - is this a promise of leniency?
- Court finds testimony from Dr. Bruce Frumkin inadmissible on whether the defendant has a propensity to make a false statement
- Is this statement an unambiguous invocation of the suspect's right to counsel - "I'd like an attorney present. I mean but I can't afford one. So I guess I'll just speak to you now. I don't have an attorney."
- "I don't want to say anything more" is an unambiguous exercise of the defendant's right to silence
- If a juvenile is questioned in a police car, is he in custody? In this case the court said no.
- Rationalizing a defendant's actions (self-defense/accident) in such a way that he "might hope that he would not be charged with murder" did not render the confession inadmissible
- Court finds that interrogators are permitted to use minimization techniques
- Court excludes the testimony of Dr. Richard Leo: "the proposed expert testimony was little more than speculation."
- Court does not allow Dr. Richard Ofshe to testify on false confession issues
- Court excludes testimony of social psychologist on false confessions
- Two courts reject the claim of ineffective counsel because an expert witness on false confessions was not called
- Court finds use of a videotape as a prop during an interrogation acceptable
- Interrogating a suspect after continued denials not coercive
- Confession voluntariness: telling defendant length of punishment and misrepresenting evidence
- Fourteenth Amendment does not require law enforcement to videotape custodial interrogations
- Is the request by a 15 year old to speak to their mother (in a custodial setting) tantamount to requesting an attorney?